Ph.D. Student Group

* ConCave is a Ph.D. Student-led group in the School of Architecture of the College of Design at Georgia Tech. The group aims at supporting Ph.D. students and their research.


︎ ConCave
︎ Members

ConCave Ph.D. Symposium 2022



April 7-8, 2022
S. Price Gilbert Memorial Library
Georgia Tech | Atlanta, GA
Divergence in Architectural Research is an international doctorate symposium organized by the ConCave Ph.D. Student Group in the Georgia Institute of Technology School of Architecture. The Ph.D. Symposium seeks to create a platform for sharing current research in architecture, with invited scholars and other doctoral students from architecture and allied fields.

The symposium will act as a nexus for connections with established scholars and fellow researchers. Contributing researchers should be PhD students whose work emerges from the architectural domain. The Symposium will take place April 7-8, 2022, on the campus of Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia.

Authors whose abstracts are accepted in the first evaluation phase are invited to submit their full paper. Full papers will be published in the peer-reviewed Proceeding Book of the symposium. Papers describing the outcome of substantive research are limited to a minimum of 3000 words and maximum of 6000 words, excluding references, endnotes, figures and captions. The full papers will go through a second peer-review. Please refer to the paper template provided, as you prepare your paper for submission in the second phase. 

Academic Advisor: Tarek Rakha
Academic Co-advisor: Elisa Dainese
Academic Coordinators: Hayri Dortdivanlioglu
Finances: Eleanna Panagoulia, Hayri Dortdivanlioglu
Communications: Yeinn Oh, Jun Wang
Logistics: Yousef Bushehri

Organization Board: Marisabel Marratt, Mehmet Bermek, Raha Motamed Rastegar, Zachary Lancaster, Tarek Sherif, Yasser El Masri, Tyler Pilet

Advisory Board: Nancey Green Leigh (Associate Dean for Research, College of Design), Scott Marble (William H. Harrison Chair, School of Architecture), Sonit Bafna (Ph.D. Program Director)

Andrés Cavieres, University of Oklahoma
Athanassios Economou, Georgia Institute of Technology
Baabak Ashuri, Georgia Institute of Technology
Belgin Turan Ozkaya, Middle East Technical University
Benay Gursoy, Pennsylvania State University
Blair MacIntyre, Georgia Institute of Technology
Bruce Stiftel, Georgia Institute of Technology
Charlie Xue City, University of Hong Kong
Christina Crawford, Emory University
Craig Zimring, Georgia Institute of Technology
Danielle Willkens, Georgia Institute of Technology
David Ejeh, Georgia Institute of Technology
Elisa Dainese, Georgia Institute of Technology
Ellen Dunham-Jones, Georgia Institute of Technology
Esra Akcan, Cornell University
Eunhwa Yang, Georgia Institute of Technology
Felecia Davis, Pennsylvania State University
George Johnston, Georgia Institute of Technology
Harris Dimitropoulos, Georgia Institute of Technology
Heather Ligler, Pennsylvania State University
Herminia Machry, Georgia Institute of Technology
Jennifer DuBose, Georgia Institute of Technology
Jensen Zhang, Syracuse University
John Peponis, Georgia Institute of Technology
John Taylor, Georgia Institute of Technology
Jonathan Dessi-Olive, Kansas State University
Joseph Choma, Clemson University
Lars Spuybroek, Georgia Institute of Technology
Lawrence Chua, Syracuse University
Michael Herzfeld, Harvard University
Myrsini Mamoli, Georgia Institute of Technology
Nassim Parvin, Georgia Institute of Technology
Nicholas Nisbet, AEC3, UCL
Nina Sharifi, Syracuse University
Peggy Deamer, Yale University
Perry Yang, Georgia Institute of Technology
Philip Yuan, University of Virginia, Tongji University
Rajan Rawal, CEPT University
Russell Gentry, Georgia Institute of Technology
Sabri Gokmen, Kadir Has University
Seray Türkay, Coskun TED University
Sonit Bafna, Georgia Institute of Technology
Subhro Guhathakurta, Georgia Institute of Technology
Tarek Rakha, Georgia Institute of Technology
Thomas Bock, TUM
Thomas Krijnen, Eindhoven University of Technology
Vernelle A. A. Noel, Georgia Institute of Technology
Yanni Loukissas, Georgia Institute of Technology
Zachary Porter, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Zeynep Kezer, Newcastle University


1. Autonomous Transportation Technology and Urbanism  
Organizer: Jun Wang

Transportation systems and mobility modes are two of the major forces shaping our cities. In the 20th century, the invention of the inner combustion engine-powered vehicle gave birth to the highway system and changed how we perceive and organize the city ever since. The creation of suburban garden neighborhoods and the spaghetti roads are the witnesses of the power transportation modes had on changing the cities. Autonomous vehicles (AVs), already stepped into our daily lives from science fiction, with different operation systems and on-road behavior compared to the previous generations of cars, are bound to impact urban designs. AVs directly affect the Flow Pattern of cities, and this change directly affects mobility patterns and transportation systems.

Faced with the unstoppable reality that AVs will become the mainstream transportation mode, this panel invites researchers studying their impacts on urban design and how urban designers can respond. The panel seeks specifically papers considering the impact of AVs on cities in three main ways: Firstly, the direct impact on the design of physical space, including the impact on street design, infrastructure system, and the interface of buildings and the environment; secondly, the impact on the spatial pattern and urban form of the city at a larger scale, including the topography of the street network, and the way different functional elements (commercial buildings, residential buildings, office buildings, etc.) are placed and organized; thirdly, the reconfiguration of the urban design theories and overall approaches at a long-term scale, as well as the change of the urban design policy-related content.

2. Building Science and the Envelope: Scholarship at the Micro and Macro Scales
Organizer: Tarek Sherif
Co-organizers: Yasser El Masri, Tyler Pilet

Global warming is an increasingly critical threat to our existence on planet Earth. Significant built environment performance advancements are sought to mitigate its effect by lowering energy consumption that contributes to climate change through their reliance on non-renewables. The interface between built environments and their contexts through the building envelope plays a significant role in the performance of those structures. While the High-Performance Building (HPB) community has been successful in simulating the effects of static envelope properties on total energy consumption, the intricacies of envelope performance and its potential global legislative adoption remains to be addressed. The temporal properties of building envelopes and the challenges concerning their deterioration and subsequently reduced performance encourage further evaluation through the full building lifecycle. On an international scale, the uniformly adopted carbon emissions goals and the required envelope design standards to reach target thresholds need to be assessed for diverse geographies. Differences in climatic conditions can create disparities in burdens placed on some territories than others. These issues raise questions pertaining to envelope performance ranging from the single house envelope examination to international policy challenges.

This panel aims to stimulate conversations regarding current scholarship in envelope design, construction, diagnostics, maintenance etc., and the necessary evolution of building envelope research to address global warming. The panel invites all building science-based envelope contributions from the micro to the macro and global scale, including addressing questions ranging from: how can humidity affect building envelope deterioration through time? All the way to: how can international envelope legislation goals be formulated to reflect both the challenges facing countries with harsher climatic conditions as well as those with evident economic limitations?

3. Data Environments: Critical Reflections on the Role of Data in the Built Environment     
Organizer: Zachary Lancaster
Co-organizers: Eleanna Panagoulia, Mehmet Bermek

Data-driven approaches in planning and design practices of the built environment are rapidly expanding under a hypothesis that these approaches contribute to faster and more accurate results. This idea has entered the discourse and influenced a surge in research concerning smart systems and applications of artificial intelligence meant to create better decision-making tools, for planning and design. Underlying these methods and their attendant tools are both human and machine algorithms and dense assemblages of information and data, whose assumptions and structure are often partially understood and left unchallenged. This leaves those responsible for the design of social and physical artifacts of the built environment making use of data without understanding the full context from which they emerge, the partial perspective that they represent and the rationale for their existence. While authors in critical data and information studies have analyzed the impacts of data and information systems, they examine the design of cities and buildings from a standpoint tangent to their architecture and planning’s own disciplinary discourse. We need to focus the critical data theory discourse to the spectrum of architecture and planning to initialize a domain wide reflection on the effects of the structural implications and rationale of data-driven methods and tools on designers, planners, and their practice.

This panel invites participants to submit articles exploring the ways systems of knowledge, information and data are constructed as a part of professional practice and academia, and the impact these systems have on design and planning. We seek contributions that justify and unpack the assumptions and structure of algorithms and the underlying structure of the data and information systems, with their core assumptions accessible to critical examination.  The goal is to catalyze a domain-wide conversation around a critical understanding of the role data play in design practice and pedagogy.

4. Health and the Built Environment
Organizer: Yousef Bushehri
Co-organizers: Raha Rastegar, Yeinn Oh

Research, teaching, and policy related to health and the built environment have snowballed in recent decades. The subject has become an established field of academic inquiry that has helped advance designs to improve a variety of mental and physical health outcomes. It has also developed relationships with other professionals across disciplines who are directly involved in making decisions about the design of the built environment, such as urban planners, architects, and policymakers.

In addition to Evidence-Based Design, originally derived from evidence-based medicine, other progressive trends in architecture and urban planning, including the green building movement and environmental psychology studies, grew out of environmental and social goals and often promoted healthy design. We still need more research to understand how to reap health benefits from the built environment. This research should address a range of spatial scales—from buildings to metropolitan areas—and a range of health outcomes—physical activity and mental health, respiratory health, neurodevelopment, and cognition, among others. Furthermore, more targeted attention to the most impacted populations is needed. Aging in place, universal design, and accessible design are examples of research trends responding to the demands of those at the greatest risk with the greatest need for intervention.

This panel explores the intersection of the built environment and mental/physical health outcomes. We seek studies on the health impact assessments and environmental metrics developed and used to evaluate built environment affordances. Although you are encouraged for this panel to incorporate the themes listed above in your submission abstract, we remain open to all research that explores and examines the impact of building design on occupants’ health and behavior.

5. Simulations for Behavioral Studies in Architecture
Organizer: Yeinn Oh
Co-organizers: Yousef Bushehri, Raha Rastegar

Buildings regulate human behavior through the built environment characteristics such as spatial form, organization, and dimensions. Studies reveal that the layout of buildings impacts the human mind and leads occupants to perform a certain behavior through a complex cognitive process. Many behavioral models attempt to explain and predict how the built environment shapes human behavior. Predicting behaviors benefits architectural research in many ways, including improving the energy performance of the building, reducing building evacuation time in emergencies, reducing stress and cognitive load in critical settings (e.g., healthcare settings), and most recently tracking human contacts for COVID-19 cases. Explaining the behaviors, on the other hand, has its own benefits; it helps to understand and develop fundamental architectural theories on human psychology.

This panel explores simulation methodologies and approaches used in behavioral studies as well as the participant’s own theory connecting around simulation tools and behavioral models. Employing simulations can cater to architects and researchers by letting them test these behavioral theories in virtual settings. For example, Space Syntax focuses on morphological analysis to predict and understand the relationship between spatial design and the use of space. Another example is the Agent-Based Simulation, which allows using autonomous, independent agents that interact with each other to predict complex social behaviors. This panel creates an opportunity for researchers working in this area to share their research and to discuss possible co-ordination of approaches and directions.

6. Weaving Craft and Design
Organizer: Hayri Dortdivanlioglu

Architecture as a profession emerged from craft practices; however, the modernist dichotomy between manual and intellectual labor has distanced architecture from craft. While architecture emphasizes the intellectual processes of design based on rational principles to bring it closer to other sciences and give it even more authority, it sees craft as merely a practice with an unexplainable process, i.e., making without knowing. This distinction causes a fuzzy boundary between craft and architecture. Throughout the history of architecture, craft and its relationship to design and architecture has fluctuated; sometimes craft is getting closer to architecture, and other times moving away from it. Despite this distinction, craft remains embedded in the process of design in the form of drawing and modeling as a manifestation of design, and a means of construction.

In contrast to this modernist separation, in one of the oldest textual sources of architectural theory, Vitruvius defines architecture as a marriage of fabrica and ratiocinatio, proposing a union of practice and theory in the body of an architect. Building upon his theory of architecture, this panel invites researchers that seek interactions between craft and architecture. The panel aims to host a conversation between historical, ethnographical, and practice-based research looking at the past, present and future entanglements of craft, and architecture. Firstly, this session invites researchers that engage with the history and historiography of the relationship between craft and architecture. Secondly, it is open to contributions that adopt onto-epistemological perspectives to the role of craft in design and architecture. Finally, it encourages submissions that carry out methodological approaches to craft as a means of design in analog, digital and computational architecture. Submissions may also examine architecture as an inquiry by making through thinking and thinking through making.

ConCave Ph.D. Student Group
+1 404-894-4885

Georgia Institute of Technology
School of Architecture
245 4th Street, NW, Suite 351
Atlanta, GA 30332